were in bad shape

[Scav]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Playa Chi racing is awful. One good day a year isn't pretty.

Easy...their turf racing is bettable almost 100% of the time

[GPK]

Originally Posted by Scav

Easy...their turf racing is bettable almost 100% of the time

2 ants crossing the street is bettable to you....

[Scav]

Originally Posted by GPK

2 ants crossing the street is bettable to you....

WHOA!!!!

FINALLY!!!!....It took you like 8 years to finally RIP on me...

That was a real good one too, I am surprised you have the capacity to come up with that....I am rubbing off too much

[Scav]

Originally Posted by GPK

2 ants crossing the street is bettable to you....

i am giong to hurt you if the 4 or 5 win the 6th race at SA. I was putting in my only wager for today (late pick four) and I put in the 5th, 7th and 8th, then I read your post, and I SCREWED up this wager and used the 1,7,8 when I wanted the 1,4,5....if the 7 or 8 win then I like you still

[Scav]

Originally Posted by Scav

i am giong to hurt you if the 4 or 5 win the 6th race at SA. I was putting in my only wager for today (late pick four) and I put in the 5th, 7th and 8th, then I read your post, and I SCREWED up this wager and used the 1,7,8 when I wanted the 1,4,5....if the 7 or 8 win then I like you still

Unbelievable.....UN"F"N BELIEVABLE...

I would have had the 1,4 with the 3........$18 over a $12....oh man...I am praying I miss the next two legs

[disappearingdan_akaplaya]

the takeout on the pick 6 here is 16% i believe

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by disappearingdan_akaplaya

the takeout on the pick 6 here is 16% i believe

That is excellent.

[disappearingdan_akaplaya]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

That is excellent.

lovely, sure poetry

[GPK]

Originally Posted by Scav

i am giong to hurt you if the 4 or 5 win the 6th race at SA. I was putting in my only wager for today (late pick four) and I put in the 5th, 7th and 8th, then I read your post, and I SCREWED up this wager and used the 1,7,8 when I wanted the 1,4,5....if the 7 or 8 win then I like you still

quit crying...aint my fault.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Scav

Easy...their turf racing is bettable almost 100% of the time

That doesn't mean the quality is awful. 10 claimers at Finger Lakes may be bettable, it doesn't make it good racing. And the takeout is an absurd 18.5% there. No go.

[Scav]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

That doesn't mean the quality is awful. 10 claimers at Finger Lakes may be bettable, it doesn't make it good racing. And the takeout is an absurd 18.5% there. No go.

18.5% for what? what wagers?

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Scav

18.5% for what? what wagers?

WPS http://www.horseplayerdaily.com/cat/Track+Takeouts.html

I believe other than the 1% bump in NY, this is up to date.

[Scav]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

WPS http://www.horseplayerdaily.com/cat/Track+Takeouts.html

I believe other than the 1% bump in NY, this is up to date.

Your a crack head...

Takeout Information

Win, place, and show: 17%
Daily Double, Quinella and Exacta wagering: 20.5%
Trifecta, Pick 3, Pick 4 and Superfecta wagering: 25%

http://www.drf.com/trackinfo/arlington_park.html

[Scav]

randall...Laurel Pick Four takeout rate is guess???






14%

Lowest in the industry, which is why they payout so well even when chalks win

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Scav

Your a crack head...

Takeout Information

Win, place, and show: 17%
Daily Double, Quinella and Exacta wagering: 20.5%
Trifecta, Pick 3, Pick 4 and Superfecta wagering: 25%

http://www.drf.com/trackinfo/arlington_park.html

I stand corrected but I'm not a crack head.
17% is too high anyway for the dreadful level of racing...I know you are a Chi homer but you need to be unbiased. It is what it is.

[Scav]

Keeneland has a 17% takeout on pick 3's, 4's and 6's....that is amazing

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

I stand corrected but I'm not a crack head.
17% is too high anyway for the dreadful level of racing...I know you are a Chi homer but you need to be unbiased. It is what it is.

I guess I am biased too, but I would hardly classify the Arlington meet as "dreadful." If it is dreadful, then what adjective would you use to describe the dozens of meets which are vastly inferior to Arlington?
Most of the Saturdays are quality, and then you have Preview Day, the Washington Park Handicap, Arlington-Washington Breeders’ Cup Lassie & the Arlington-Washington Breeders’ Cup Futurity, the Prarie State Festival, and of course the big races on Million Day.
Is it Saratoga or Del Mar....no.
Is it "dreadful"....no.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

I stand corrected but I'm not a crack head.
17% is too high anyway for the dreadful level of racing...I know you are a Chi homer but you need to be unbiased. It is what it is.

You can't be serious because saying its dreadful is completely off base. I have never heard Chicago racing referred to as dreadful. It isn't, and I feel that I am unbiased in this regard. I can understand if you were just trying to get a reaction from certain Chicago people.