![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wow, I thought JolyB had that. Turns out he bet Oaklawn instead of Gulf. My mistake.
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I thought samething. I was about to congratulate on massive hit and then realized it was Oaklawn instead of Gulfstream.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Given my customary style of wagering, it would be very unlikely for me to have a monster hit like that. But I appreciate your even thinking that it was possible. I can still dream.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Two tracks make my head hurt
__________________
"The more I learn about humans, the more I love horses" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't mind playing two tracks, but maybe less races would have been better. Even though I think we should try to play all races that might affect the Kentucky Derby Day like The Arkansas Derby and even the Fantasy, I could have done without the rest of the card at Oaklawn. The problem with Oaklawn to me is that there is no turf and I know that some of our players like to play those races and we have some that like to play maiden races and we have some that like multi-race bets so, to that end, I would have played most of the races at Gulf with a couple from Oaklawn or maybe just the Arkansas Derby with Gulf.
All that said, it was still a fun day and a good distraction from the real world, albeit fleeting. Last edited by cal828 : 03-30-2025 at 10:17 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|