![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Running back on short rest could put the generational talent status achieved in the Grade 3 Honeybee in jeopardy. Not to mention upsetting her commercial value, running afoul of modern breeding trends, and shattering the delicate egos of wannabe industry leaders in the process... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was laughing pretty hard at the last paragraph too
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That's when it's fun to see if you can be right about the speculation of the future. Just like I was in ZENYATTA'S 2nd race. Jerry Brown compared her to EIGHT BELLES. It was me who said generational talent. Which I think is still in play. Fillies don't need to beat colts to be considered generational. Ruffian, Zenyatta, Personal Ensign, Monomoy Girl et al. Is she as good as those? Probably not. But is it that big of stretch to win the Cotillion and BC Distaff? That would put her in line for an Eclipse and G consideration. The jury is still out. And Freddy. Who cares what you laugh at? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Winning the Cotillion and Distaff would make her generational?
I've heard it all now. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I said G consideration.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah that's ridiculous.
I'm not sure she's a good as Swiss Skydiver who actually won the Preakness, was 2nd in the Bluegrass, won the Alabama, etc. and no one thought she was generational. It's okay to just admit you wildly overestimated her talent because she ran at the track you announce at. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I care deeply about what you laugh at.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I predicted Freddy was an untalented degenerate with special needs WAY BACK at the old DRF message board.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|