![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You might want to slow it down to super slow mo or even frame by frame. I've seen a whole lot of stretch runs looking for contact. In that race there most definitely was. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The optics were bad, I get that, but the rider on the runner up didn’t flinch, he just rode all the way through. Wouldn’t he at least have reacted if he was bumped in to? Either way, no one here can say they haven’t seen MUCH worse stay up almost daily. This was a bad rider getting taken down because the leasing rider claimed foul. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I’m going to compliment you though Vic. You’ve managed to not make this all about you...yet.
Congrats! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Finally got around to watching this. That was a pretty bad DQ. How do you justify something like that to the betting public?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I know the optics looked bad but in reality it was just race riding. Just tough watching worse everyday that stays up
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The margin was a nose, if even that (literally a bob). There was contact and the 5 was pushed out 1.5-2 paths. The 5 had all the momentum and the 4 would have come down even in the stringent of jurisdictions. I've seen some egregious DQs, but this is a non-story.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You watch the right race? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I guess the finish is close enough for the steward's the make this call, but I don't agree this would have been a DQ in every racing jurisdiction. I suppose it could be, but steward decisions are inconsistent enough that it's really hard to know how this would have been decided elsewhere. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|