Weekend Stakes Beyers

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

I just asked a question. Your attempts at insults are so old that they do nothing to me now. You're much better than this. Now, perhaps you can just answer the question without the sideshow.

It's a fair and simple question. You judge everything after you get whatever information you want to judge. Sorry if you don't like being out-trolled.

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

It's a fair and simple question. You judge everything after you get whatever information you want to judge. Sorry if you don't like being out-trolled.

I watch countless others inquire about numbers that Steve doesn't originally post and you just give the number without commentary. I inquire and not only can you not do the same and just give the number without commentary but your commentary has to attempt to be insulting. You've now replied twice to my original question and still have yet to provide the information that I asked about. If you don't want to give it, like you do for anyone else, that's fine. You have that right. But this is still beneath you. You are a knowledgeable, well respected industry insider and I'm just a poster on a message board yet you constantly, for years, feel the need to attempt to make fun of or belittle me. Why is it really that important to you to try to convey to everyone how much you know and understand the game compared to how little I know or understand it? In any case, is there any chance you could, I don't know, just provide an answer to the simple question that was asked?

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

I watch countless others inquire about numbers that Steve doesn't originally post and you just give the number without commentary. I inquire and not only can you not do the same and just give the number without commentary but your commentary has to attempt to be insulting. You've now replied twice to my original question and still have yet to provide the information that I asked about. If you don't want to give it, like you do for anyone else, that's fine. You have that right. But this is still beneath you. You are a knowledgeable, well respected industry insider and I'm just a poster on a message board yet you constantly, for years, feel the need to attempt to make fun of or belittle me. Why is it really that important to you to try to convey to everyone how much you know and understand the game compared to how little I know or understand it? In any case, is there any chance you could, I don't know, just provide an answer to the simple question that was asked?

I treat you as I expect to be treated, as another person posting on the internet. Most people ask for numbers because they are curious. You ( who I have known on message boards for a long time, and like ) ask so you can troll and comment on them....thus, you get slightly different treatment. Hardly unfair.

Why would you be "very curious" what number a winner got in a race that, while between two races, was actually completely different? You can't really compare them.

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I treat you as I expect to be treated, as another person posting on the internet. Most people ask for numbers because they are curious. You ( who I have known on message boards for a long time, and like ) ask so you can troll and comment on them....thus, you get slightly different treatment. Hardly unfair.

Why would you be "very curious" what number a winner got in a race that, while between two races, was actually completely different? You can't really compare them.

You assume the reason I want to know the number. You assume what kind of comment I would make about it. Is it a silly assumption? Perhaps not, based on the long time we've interacted on boards, as you've said. But, it's still an assumption nonetheless. If you're right, and I comment on them and say something that you think is ridiculous, by all means, let me have it. You've never held back before. I really just was curious.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

You assume the reason I want to know the number. You assume what kind of comment I would make about it. Is it a silly assumption? Perhaps not, based on the long time we've interacted on boards, as you've said. But, it's still an assumption nonetheless. If you're right, and I comment on them and say something that you think is ridiculous, by all means, let me have it. You've never held back before. I really just was curious.

You're just mad because I beat you to the punch. Admit it:-)

93

[Dahoss]

I’ll provide hugs for anyone in this thread that needs them

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

You're just mad because I beat you to the punch. Admit it:-)

93

Thank you.

[RolloTomasi]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

You're just mad because I beat you to the punch. Admit it:-)

The irony is that Loud Mouth was the only stakes winner of the 3 heading into Saturday...

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

The irony is that Loud Mouth was the only stakes winner of the 3 heading into Saturday...

I thought it was a really good race. A head and a nose separated the top three finishers at the wire and they all battled gamely for the last quarter-mile and the figure indicates that it was a pretty decent race.