![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'll pass over the fact that the $6.50 payoff was the show payoff not the place. From a handicapping perspective, the player who likes a longshot (let's call him Reconfigure) and plays him $2 WP would of course wish that he won at 24-1, but would take a lot of consolation in getting a return of $10.60 on his $4 wager for Reconfigure's second place finish. You could have a winning day at the races with a couple of picks like that. You could also finish in the top couple of places in the ROI quite often with a payoff like that. I tend to be heavily driven in my wagering by numbers and probability. After all, the object of wagering is to win more than you have bet. It's been my experience that 24-1 shots probably finish second much more frequently than they win - if a speed horse, might get to the lead and be good (or lucky) enough to hold off all of the closers except one. If a closer, might make a strong run at the finish and be able to run down all of the opponents except one. That's why they are 24-1 in the first place. Naturally, the most likely result is that they won't hit the board at all, but that's a story for another day. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
“ $6.50 payoff was the show payoff not the place “
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPSADOODLE ![]() ~ However Even a $10.60 PLACE Would not have been enough to matter in ROI With subtracting $100 from the total winnings of the day ![]() Unless one of my other wagers hit the big time ![]() So I shall continue with my usual Frisky Feline Fetish Of WIN WAGERS And Whine With Wilted Whiskers When They Run 2nd ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|