Regardless, History is being made.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by CheekyBird

If Trump had prepared he would have mitigated most of these issues. But he didn't. Lord knows he interrupted over 51 times. He could have used those interruptions to "set the record straight." But he didn't. Why? Because he didn't prepare, thinks he knows it all when he actually knows very little. He thought he could just show up, use his stump speech and get away with it.

That being said, Lester Holt was, indeed, awful. But that didn't affect Hillary because, (gasp!) she prepared! (And she knows what she's talking about).

Post-debate election polling:



Love it when libs smugly think they know WTF is happening right before their eyes.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Paul Joseph Watson tweet - So HRC's brand new poster child is a porn star accused of driving a murder getaway vehicle and threatening to kill a judge.

LOL


20 years ago Trump called a fat woman fat; 20 years ago Hillary was threatening her husband's rape victims.

Which one is the media obsessed with?

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

20 years ago Trump called a fat woman fat; 20 years ago Hillary was threatening her husband's rape victims.

Which one is the media obsessed with?

Juanita Broaddrick RIPS Chelsea Clinton’s statement on her father’s affairs

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2016/0...thers-affairs/

[Pants II]

Never Forget

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDMktUYvC7k

[knickslions2]

All I know is I've never seen two more unqualified people in my life in position to run this Country. I can't believe someone else hasn't stepped up to challenge these yahoos. I have a few Rhesus monkeys on site that would be more qualified.

[Pants II]

They're both better than the current one in office. You can't name a thing he has done to benefit the country. Not one.

Every financial aspect that can be deemed positive is because a President has never had the Fed cover for them like this one.

He's an absolute imbecile and will go down as the worst President in history amongst true intellectuals who aren't part of the white genocide movement.

[CheekyBird]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Post-debate election polling:



Love it when libs smugly think they know WTF is happening right before their eyes.

Who do you think will win?

We ask voters who they expect to see win, regardless of which candidate they support. Over the years, asking voters their expectation about which candidate will win often has proved to predict elections more reliably than asking how they plan to vote. That’s particularly true when the election is still many weeks away.

Hillary Clinton 53.6% Donald Trump 41.2% Area of uncertainty* Based on 2,565 respondents As of Sep. 11, 2016

Source: http://graphics.latimes.com/usc-pres...oll-dashboard/

[Pants II]

Trump had over 25,000 people at the Melbourne, Fl rally.

They had to turn away 12,000 people. This amount of people is the total Hillary has had for all her rallies since August 1st.

People who believe polls conducted by the mainstream media are the type of people who can be persuaded to suck a fart for equal rights.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by CheekyBird

Hillary Clinton 53.6% Donald Trump 41.2% Area of uncertainty* Based on 2,565 respondents As of Sep. 11, 2016

Source: http://graphics.latimes.com/usc-pres...oll-dashboard/

Was this ancient history poll you're citing taken before or after she "got overheated" in 70 degree weather and fell unconscious, reportedly soiling herself?

Never Forget

[Pants II]

https://youtu.be/3XSuG5aCFGs