![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What will be the reason California Chrome loses the Belmont. | |||
| He cannot get the distance |
|
7 | 20.59% |
| Quality of competition is too great |
|
5 | 14.71% |
| The last eleven going for the TC all lost, proving it's impossible to win |
|
2 | 5.88% |
| He's got too much of a disadvantage with the pace setup |
|
5 | 14.71% |
| He'll get a bad ride |
|
4 | 11.76% |
| He doesn't like the Belmont surface |
|
0 | 0% |
| The common belief that he's not good enough to be a triple crown winner |
|
3 | 8.82% |
| Too many haters out there to overcome. |
|
8 | 23.53% |
| Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() i thought it would get someone to respond! seriously tho...sometimes horses lose. he might. there may be no reason why, other than another horse had a better day. i know rupert (for example) thinks the best horse always wins, but we all know that's not the case. secretariat lost 1/4th of his races. why? so, excuses can be made, but sometimes stuff just happens. so many, many things can cause it, or a combo of the same. i hope chrome wins it, mainly due to the backstory of the horse itself. i think commercial breeders have done more to harm this industry than any other person or group that can affect the sport. super trainers are a close second, with their belief in minimal racing. this horse would show that good horses can come from nowhere, and that it's a good thing to let them grow up outdoors, run at two, and get all the things that create a strong horse that can handle racing more than a couple times of year. now, if chrome loses, it would be a shame if some discounted everything he's managed thus far. he's a blue collar horse, and i appreciate horses like him a lot more than some of the others that have come down the pike.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |