Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Sigh ... I was agreeing with sarcasm inherent in your posting the link. I was agreeing with you. I was agreeing with the negative comments about Obama, given his previous relationship as the golden boy from Wall Street - a position he's clearly lost based upon campaign finance filings this election cycle.
Is this really too hard? Reading?
|
Considering your 24/7 vigil to defend all things Barrack, from his response to the Gulf Oil Spill to signing every piece of corrupt legislation spewed from Congress, to ignoring homosexuals until it's politically convenient then, yes - you may want to point out your "agreeing with sarcasm" when it is in fact that.
I can honestly admit it was completely lost on me. Fairly sure that would be a trend here as well.
05-16-2012, 06:56 PM
Threaded Mode