![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
<<NATALIE JACKSON: OK, we haven’t received the autopsy yet, so everything we know about where Trayvon was shot comes from the person who prepared the body. And it was in the center of the chest. The release of the body—the parents knew where Trayvon was the next day, when they filed a missing person’s report. However, he was labeled a John Doe for three days, even after the parents identified [him] as [their] son. That is the problem. So that was a little bit of people not quite understanding what happened. AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain that? NATALIE JACKSON: No, we can’t. The parents asked for the release of the body. He was labeled a John Doe. They would not release the body for three days. JUAN GONZALEZ: So, in other words, they were informed by the next day that he was dead? NATALIE JACKSON: Yes. AMY GOODMAN: But was that only after they had filed a missing person’s report? NATALIE JACKSON: That is correct, after they had filed a missing person’s report.>> http://www.democracynow.org/2012/3/3...ey_on_mounting So, it's a situation where the police have already determined no crime was committed, and yet they refuse to release the body to the parents (or even properly identify it). Why not? There's no conflict over what to do with the body, and the police claimed there was no crime committed. So why delay, and why not label the body properly, since the police knew the identity?
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray |