
10-11-2006, 03:15 PM
|
 |
The Curragh
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Well I'm sure since keeneland owns half the company that makes Poly, that the expense is a lot less than it would be if you pay to have a poly surface installed wholesale. The numbers I hear tossed out are anywhere from 8-10 mill to have a poly type surface installed.
No way could Keeneland not use the surface, since they own half the company who makes it. What kind of advertising would that be if they didn't?
My take is that horse health only became a concern when someone could make money on selling a surface for this much cash.
Darrell Vienna wondered aloud after Cali said all tracks would go to Poly "why can't we just have a safer dirt track?". I think many others have wondered the same thing.
Trainers have been complaining for years about juiced up tracks on big race days that produce incredible fractions and sore horses.
Its not rocket science to install a deeper cushion and put some deeper soil or loam out there on top. Then you harrow it deeper and don't water the **** out of it all day long producing concrete.
The cost of doing this compared to Poly installation is minimal. But noone would make any cash, or get any gratuities for their help in choosing it.
I wonder how many Cali lawmakers who voted on this got contributions from these companies? I'd love to see that info!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Thanks for the insight.
|