Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
Yes they take very few cases but they haven't taken one in 22 years such as this. More a, we are due factor, than rewriting the law....As for the internet post, the line of questioning didn't follow that that was their main concern for the case. Second, if they upheld the judgment, every blogger who is critical of someone from here on out will be taken to court....In 2 months we will see who is correct.
|
they also haven't ruled on slavery recently, randall.
i like the idea of the justices sitting around deciding which cases to take based on the fact they haven't done it in a while. "yeah, it's settled law and there's nothing for us to add but it's been 150 years dude!"
that's not the way it's done though. they have a point to make. we'll find out what it is.
10-07-2010, 06:00 PM
Threaded Mode