Quote:
Originally Posted by CSC
Don't tell me you can't tell the difference if a course that is truly soft or not? My original point was it is high time horseracing progressed and used another system, preferably measuring numerically, the depth of moisture in turf races. That way the "Indian Charlie's'" of the world can have a better and accurate representation of the cut in the ground, rather than making blanket statements that all races with moisture in the ground are either soft or yielding.
|
That's all well and good. Propose that and let's get the ball rolling.
But that doesn't change the fact that you've spent two pages trying to point out that a course that's playing about 3 seconds slower at 5.5f is somehow NOT noticeably slower than it would have been on a different footing, ie "firm."
That's hogwash, and to use your words, "don't tell me you can't tell the difference."