Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 07-18-2009, 10:51 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
Excellent points being raised on all fronts. I think NYRA and RWB are in close contact and harmony on the Paragallo follow through. The private property issue should still apply in the new state-association scenario. (Perhaps Oak Tree Association holding sway during its' seasonal tenure at Santa Anita can be pointed to as an example.)

If RWB and/or NYRA have reason to believe the transfer of True Quality was dubious, they have every right under the domain of the racetrack to demand proof otherwise.

Well I don't get what isn't crystal fn clear about a bill of sale. I realize Pags is a douche but discrimination comes with consequence.. I doubt if the track was owned by an individual who could be held financially accountable for its actions would such a position have been taken.

I know its a popular stance to Fcuk with a JO who starves horses but how does punishing the rightful owner help?
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.