Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
PETA may not know what they're talking about when it comes to specifics about horseracing. But I would not criticize them for being critical of horseracing. When you have horses being forced to race and breaking their legs and dying, that is pretty hard to defend. Most of my livelihood comes from horseracing, but I can't sit here in good conscience and claim that there is no cruelty in horseracing. And I'm certainly not going to get mad at a group (PETA) who sees horses dying and wants some answers.
I'm glad someone is speaking up. I'm glad that someone cares. PETA's specific criticisms may not be correct, but if they were properly educated I think they would come up with tons of legitimate criticisms.
What happened to Eight Belles may have been a fluke, but most breakdowns are not flukes. Most horses that break down are very unsound horses that should not be racing.
|
lets say it was your horse in the derby that broke down, and while you were dealing with the anguish, Peta named you as someone that should be suspended, without doing any type of investigation into whether or not you did anything wrong, but went right to the national media and called you out for sanction. would you still not be mad, and be talking about how great it is that they are speaking out?