![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It is a bit of a double edged sword in many sectors.
Private companies bottom line is profit, so they are willing to break rules and screw people if they can turn a profit. Even if it is short term in many cases. This does happen. But there are companies in business for the longterm that have provided innovation the government could not have possibly accomplished. And have made peoples lives better, especially in medicine. A huge % of new drugs to help all sorts of illnesses are discovered and produced in the US. A bit of government help is also involved. The government provides very little incentive for workers to actually do a good job though. The government does a horrible job at many things requiring vigiliance of others money and efficiency. There is no incentive for running a tight ship in many cases. But in some cases, especially local governments, police, fire, and other services are quite good because it is done locally and with pride. It is a complex problem that will always be debated. How much of a role does government need to play in providing various services to the people who the government represents. I would also argue on the whole the public school system does work in middle class to affluent areas. But in many urban and some rural areas, its very poor. And it is completely understandable. What teacher in their right mind wants to go into a war zone where parents put their kids on the bus so they can be done with them. And some rural areas might be dominated by people (usually older folks) who are unwilling to help fund public schools so they have to drag "teachers" off the streets because the pay is just above a Whataburger. |