here is what i think,start calling me a dummy

[ontheoutside]

justify wins the Belmont by 6 to 10 lengths

reasoning? ok here is my light bulb moment

in the derby there was nothing in there to push him all the way around

you had kinda cheap speed go maybe 5 furlongs and then spit the bit
justify took over and always had a 2 length lead at all times after that

in the Preakness there was no cheap speed there was a solid horse who took lustify to the limit in good magic nothing cheap about him

my thinking is you need a horse that can have speed throughout the whole race good magic did that and only got beat a length[ a credit to the horse he is
if anyone had that kind of horse ,the Preakness was the race to put him in, not the Belmont I think you will get a couple of cheap speed horses that will take justify ,who will lye 3rd to the 5 furlong pole and justify just cruises by there isn't a horse out there that can sustain what good magic did in Preakness this will not be close