Extreme Vetting

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

Let me put it in list format for you since you have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt you are incapable with understanding things presented in paragraph form.

1. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH LEGAL IMMIGRATION FROM ANY PART OF THE WORLD!!

2. I HAVE A BIG PROBLEM WITH REDUCING THE VETTING TIME BY 80% FOR REFUGEES THAT HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED BY ISIS AND THOSE INFILTRATORS HAVE ALREADY SLAUGHTERD SCORES IN FRANCE AND GERMANY.

One extrapolating the above into me being an isolationist is either a complete moron or a troll. OR Both

Oh and when you say absurd stuff like we are safer than we ever have been after 2 terroist attacks this year you will get the you deserve cause you earned it.

You cannot say it is absurd when it is true, and then say you want decisions based on facts.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...afraid/384965/

And how do Americans celebrate this extraordinary success? By denying it. Every year Gallup asks whether crime has gone up or down since the previous year. Every year, rain or shine, the public insists, usually by overwhelming margins (63 percent to 21 percent in 2014), that crime has risen. “Most Americans Unaware of Big Crime Drop Since 1990s,” announced the Pew Research Center in 2013; only 10 percent of those surveyed knew that gun crimes had gone down since the 1990s. Criminologists say that many people get angry when told that crime is decreasing.

Perception is even more skewed where terrorism is concerned. “Terror-ism Worries Largely Unchanged,” ran another Pew headline, also in 2013. That year, 58 percent of the public was worried about another terrorist attack in the United States, a rate not all that much lower in October 2001, immediately after the 9/11 attacks, when 71 percent of the public was worried. A few months ago, perhaps influenced by isis’s atrocities, a large plurality of respondents told NBC News/Wall Street Journal pollsters that the country is less safe than it was before 9/11
Reality, once again, tells us otherwise. State-sponsored international terrorism, writes the intelligence analyst Paul R. Pillar in Cato’s A Dangerous World?, “is today only a shadow of what it was in the 1970s and 1980s.” As for the risk posed by terrorism inside the United States, to characterize it as trivial would be very generous. Americans are about four times as likely to drown in their bathtub as they are to die in a terrorist attack. John Mueller of Ohio State University and Mark G. Stewart of Australia’s University of Newcastle estimate the odds of such deaths at one in 950,000 and one in 3.5 million, respectively.

Facts and stats. What you claim you want.

As for refugees, you have railed against them from day one. You post a link thst distorts the facts in the original story, and think it tells the true story. No, it just fits your story. And then you have the nerve to say i am stupid or a troll. Amazing. You dont like what i post, so you once again stoop to name calling. Cannot argue the post, so attack the poster. Typical.