Excerpt:
"There’s something different about what happened from Charlie Hebdo, and I think everybody would feel that. There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of – not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, okay, they’re really angry because of this and that."
...so is he nuts or just following in lock step with the top man?
It isn't clear to you that he misspoke and corrected it?
11-18-2015, 01:12 PM
Threaded Mode