![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
For me I think talking to the jockeys is useful. IMO there can never be too much information to add to the decision making equation. Camera angles do not always give us the proper perspective. Veteran riders can suggest looking at the film from a different point of view. Pointing out something we might not have considered. Of course credibility plays a huge role. If a guy blindly advocates his position no matter the incident, 100 % of the time, his testimony might not carry quite as much weight. Jock you slammed him into the fence. He almost came off. " No I didn't. He ran into the fence on his own. I didn't have anything to do with it" If the tapes clearly show otherwise he takes a credibility hit that might not serve him when we hope for an honest answer to an honest question. The other side is jockey who will answer questions honestly no matter which side of the inquiry they're on. Speaking to them can be a huge help. Many have that outstanding trait. They understand if they speak the truth from the heart, every time, it will in the long run strengthen their credibility. They look at the big picture for their career not one particular incident. I've had times where on very close calls I've asked the rider straight out. Do you believe that foul cost you a placing? There are three answers you'll hear. 1. Absolutely. I was rolling and he sawed me off. I was going to win the race. 2. I'm not sure. 3. You know judge. He got me pretty good. But I was out of horse at the time. I don't think it cost me. None of those answers will exclusively carry the day. However, as I said before. The more information at our disposal the better. |