Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 11-12-2009, 05:21 AM
SOREHOOF's Avatar
SOREHOOF SOREHOOF is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Peoples Republic of the United Socialist States of Chinese America
Posts: 1,501
Default

Maybe an "Insurees bill of rights" would clear up some of the more blatent abuses by the insurance companies. Tort reform is a no brainer. I simply don't trust a Govt. takeover of health care. They have a proven track record of screwing everything they touch all the way up. This Govt. doesn't give a sh!t about anyones health. It is simply a tax and power grab. Eventually the other side will have control of this fiasco. That should scare the sh!t out of the left.
__________________
"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military."...William S. Burroughs
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 11-12-2009, 05:55 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SOREHOOF
Maybe an "Insurees bill of rights" would clear up some of the more blatent abuses by the insurance companies. Tort reform is a no brainer. I simply don't trust a Govt. takeover of health care. They have a proven track record of screwing everything they touch all the way up. This Govt. doesn't give a sh!t about anyones health. It is simply a tax and power grab. Eventually the other side will have control of this fiasco. That should scare the sh!t out of the left.
That's about the only thing in this forum that I think I have ever agreed with you on!
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 11-12-2009, 10:08 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Then you guys will be happy that tort reform and malpractice arbitration improvements are in the House bill.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...760366872.html
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 11-12-2009, 11:13 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Riot- Real tort reform would put your own personal legal situation in much better standing.
Naw. Better would be consumer protections so that I don't have to sue an insurance company I've had for years because they told the doctor and hospital that I was covered for a procedure, then six months later they changed their minds and told the hospital they wouldn't pay for it.

My procedure wouldn't be scheduled by either the doctor or the hospital until they got approval from my insurance company that it was covered. The insurance company approved it prior to the procedure.

Tort reform has nothing to do with it. I'm not trying to recover damages for anything.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 11-12-2009, 11:18 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm going to go out on a limb and say your health insurance is with Anthem.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 11-12-2009, 11:19 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
That is surprising to me. By law, I don't understand how they can do that. Maybe the laws are different in different states.
I don't, either. I sent the case to the State Insurance Board as an insurance company fraud complaint, and the final answer was, "nothing we can do about it".
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 11-12-2009, 11:32 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Here is a good chart that was around in the newspapers this past week, comparing specific provisions within the three health reform bills out there approved by House/Senate:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6709715.hmtl
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 11-12-2009, 02:57 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

The Republicans offered up a very reasonable plan, that addressed all the issues that people are concerned about. Tort reform, opening up competition, providing a hardship safety net for people who fall through the cracks, regulating industry the industry for pre-existing conditions, etc. The CBO scored the plan and found it actuall reduced costs. Their plan wouldn't raise taxes and punish businesses and explode the deficit like Obama/Pelosi would. Of course this plan was dead on arrival and was shot down in a hot minute.

the Democrats main focus isn't on solving problems. their first mission is to take over the system, that to them solves the problem. they only know one approach, total central command and control, that way it consolidates more power in Washington and guarantees that they will be able to meddle in ours lives forever.

they'll pass some hideous bill, but I'm not too worried about it because I'm pretty confident it will be scrapped by the next congress.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 11-12-2009, 04:37 PM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
BWS-Comparing abortion and diabetes is a real stretch considering how one is a lifetime health issue complicated by several different variables and the other is generally a one-time lifestyle choice.
The point is the same in all the situations I listed. If you don't want to talk about people who don't control their potential to get diabetes by having a proper diet, exercise, etc, then talk about prenatal care. Talk about someone with a carpentry or interior improvement hobby that involves a saw that cuts off their finger on accident.

The latter two are certainly "lifestyle choices" that lead to people needing insurance companies to pay for them, but if you ask me, the care involved in having a baby and getting your finger reattached is totally elective.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 11-12-2009, 11:09 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Politico reports that the Republican National Committee employee health insurance through Cigna has offered elective abortion since 1991. The company says they could of opted out, but chose not to.

The RNC is rushing to ... change that now.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 11-13-2009, 05:00 PM
Nascar1966 Nascar1966 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I don't, either. I sent the case to the State Insurance Board as an insurance company fraud complaint, and the final answer was, "nothing we can do about it".

Isnt this the answer that we get all the time when we as a consumer have a complaint?
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 11-13-2009, 06:38 PM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
The Republicans offered up a very reasonable plan, that addressed all the issues that people are concerned about. Tort reform, opening up competition, providing a hardship safety net for people who fall through the cracks, regulating industry the industry for pre-existing conditions, etc. The CBO scored the plan and found it actuall reduced costs. Their plan wouldn't raise taxes and punish businesses and explode the deficit like Obama/Pelosi would.
The Republican plan most certainly did NOT address "all the issues that people are concerned about."
One of the issues people are concerned about - for example - is the 17% of Americans who currently have no health insurance. According to the CBO evaluation, the Republican plan....would make zero impact on that number over the next decade. That's right, they came up with a health care plan that doesn't provide people who don't have coverage with coverage.
I think that qualifies as an issue that at least some people are concerned about.
Read for yourself:
http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/127463
or read the CBO review itself:
http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=10705

The direct quote from them is:
"The share of legal nonelderly residents with insurance coverage in 2019 would be about 83 percent, roughly in line with the current share."

Listen, I'm not a big fan of this half-assed measure that the House passed (or the cowardly Democrats who passed it) but lets not pretend for one second that John Boehner has all the answers.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.