|  |  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#21  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#22  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Washington was completely dominated by USC. There is absolutely no reason for the Pac-12 to have an "automatic". The game against Bama will be a ratings disaster and snoozefest. 
				__________________ RIP identity politics 1965-2016 | 
| 
			 
			#23  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   I just can't get that 49-10 DRUBBING that Michigan handed to PSU earlier this year out of my headp. GO BLUE!  
				__________________ "A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel | 
| 
			 
			#24  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Penn state was down 7 linebackers in that game plus offensive linemen.  Different team now | 
| 
			 
			#25  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 I have actually always been a fan, predicted and bet them vs Wisconsin and believe they should be in the playoff. Seems like the consensus says big 10 is the best conference so why don't they get 2 teams in. I think its crazy and really hope this makes it go to an 8 team playoff. Its early, but they are my big play in the bowl games. I already locked them in at 7.5 on sportsinteraction.com that could backfire but I believe the line trends towards them. They kind of just refuse to lose. I'm hoping its like 5 game day and I got some value a month out. I have been a fan since the Kerry Collins and Kijana Carter and Larry Johnson days. | 
| 
			 
			#26  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 I'm more than slightly relieved. Penn st woulda been a tough game. Washington is like a gift. They beat no one and got whipped by the only good team they played. Don't know how you can beat Ohio st. , win the conference and not be in. Fallout from Sandusky | 
| 
			 
			#27  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
    lmao at myself! | 
| 
			 
			#28  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Would increasing this to 8 games take care of the problem. Seems to me a lot less debate about who gets spots 7-8. | 
| 
			 
			#29  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   6 teams should be the standard.  Two play-in games for the semifinals.  1 and 2 seed get a bye. 
				__________________ RIP identity politics 1965-2016 | 
| 
			 
			#30  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   I can live with that.. Was thinking 8 teams would get resolved in 3 sessions. Your scenario works only thing will be the arguing about who gets the bye. | 
| 
			 
			#31  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Sorry I get defensive in the pedo jokes. | 
| 
			 
			#32  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Lol | 
| 
			 
			#33  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   I like the 8 with the top 5 having to be conference champs. Only issue is teams that go all the way will be playing as many games as nfl | 
| 
			 
			#34  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   | 
| 
			 
			#35  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Well played suckeyes lol. Don't win conference shouldn't get in. | 
| 
			 
			#36  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Going to be a "big league" championship game.  
				__________________ RIP identity politics 1965-2016 | 
| 
			 
			#37  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Such a shame that I can't take Condi's place to influence the other pinheads. 
				__________________ RIP identity politics 1965-2016 | 
| 
			 
			#38  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Ass Whooping time!!!!!!! | 
| 
			 
			#39  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Darnold is the best QB in CFB hands down. 
				__________________ RIP identity politics 1965-2016 | 
| 
			 
			#40  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   And it's tied. Like I said he's the best. I'm actually jealous he's not wearing crimson. 
				__________________ RIP identity politics 1965-2016 |