|  |  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#21  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   I was assuming that you could provide the explanation that wasn't provided in your earlier response.  Sorry. | 
| 
			 
			#22  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   I honestly think you know the answer. 
				__________________ Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB | 
| 
			 
			#23  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Where was applause requested? | 
| 
			 
			#24  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 But let's be real... and like Steve, I'm pro gambler all the way... but I'm also in a unique spot where I can see the business from the other side. If horse racing said, "On Saturday, the nationwide takeout will be 10%" ... would handle be drastically affected? What about the visa-versa? Another question to think about... Should horse racing gamblers pay a "premium" for gambling on a game where logic/understanding/hard work can prevail over luck (roulette, for example) in the long run? Is that fair to say? Takeout is one of many issues facing horse racing... but having a quick slash in the takeout will not save the sport. It doesn't hurt, but it's not the Holy Grail some are painting it to be. | 
| 
			 
			#25  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#26  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   I like Frank's idea of a mega "powerball" horse racing lottery . The pols have cut deeply into horse racing handle with their own lotteries . We'll see if they want to give us a chance in that arena . If so , it would increase handle and might afford an opportunity to lower takeout on existing wagers . I think handle has to go up before takeout goes down . 
				__________________ Tom Cooley photo | 
| 
			 
			#27  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |