![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Say they may put her back on the turf...
![]() http://www.ntra.com/content.aspx?typ...on=bc&id=21778 Sorry if someone already posted this. I just read it.
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'd get rid of the Triple Crown delusions as she isn't that great on dirt. She's good enough to win the Kentucky Oaks but not the Derby especially not as a front runner. They should keep her on the turf until the Oaks and after winning that point to the Grand Slam of Grass races against the boys.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() She is probably the "BEST" money maker of any we saw Sat. Stud value not considered she will out do all the guys.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow fractions on the golden rail, I say keep her on Turf...
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think the connections would be wise to keep her on the turf. It is highly unlikely she will win another significant dirt race. First of all, she set a slow pace, on the inside on a strong rail, and still ran an unremarkable final time against a VERY bad field. The likelihood that better 2YO fillies are not out there is very slim and the winner of the Pocohontas the prior Sunday is already a better and faster horse ( though with possible distance limitations ).
She was the most inconclusive BC winner Saturday.....candy trip versus a terrible field. Good luck to her on the dirt in the future. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|