![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() handle will be down if they dont..imo
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Fixing it could actually make it worst. I have a wedding tomorrow and will be placing all of my bets at 11am. I already adjusted. Took out horses like Summer Applause and New Years Day and added speed horses like Diamond Bachlor and Starship Truffles.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Track has been playing this way for a while,don't expect it to change now,until i see them harrowing clockwise which i've thought slows it down ?But we will not see it.
Remember Trinniberg last year who usually would get caught late but motored on ? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Trinniberg won that race on the square. Speed was good last year, but not like today.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Finally somebody who makes sense.... ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Doing the speed figures for SA yesterday, I felt it justified to split the variant after race 4 on the dirt. I felt evidence was strong enough to suggest that the dirt track slowed down a few lengths after race 4.
I'm not too big on variant splits either. IMO, had the Distaff or Dirt Mile been run as one of the first four races, the times (fractions and final) would have even been faster. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Call me crazy but i didn't see any blatant bias. Yesterdays track couldn't compare to Belmonts extreme bias it displayed during that stretch during BC preview weekend.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |