![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How in the world do they not take down the 2 - Pelican Lake?
It was better for me that he stayed up, but damn, that seemed pretty obvious. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() B/c Bond needed a win.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() They have no idea what the hell they're doing. When the jockeys get on the phone with them there might as well be a monkey on the other end.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Home vs. Away team.
Doesn't bother me because Plesa has a knack for burning my tickets up. Why he's at Toga can be chalked up to delusions of grandeur. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I can't dispute the fact that the 7 was likely not running better than 4th. However, if we're at a point where the only criteria for a DQ is whether it cost the affected party a placing then what's stopping jockeys from plowing into tired horses left and right? That's how injuries happen.
That was a ridiculously terrible non-call. NT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
In both horseracing and football I think the argument can be made that the interference is irrelevant if it does not change the outcome. However, I still think the jockeys should get days for reckless moves like this. There obviously needs to be some deterrent to reckless riding. In the race in question, Bridgmohan got lucky that the horse he fouled held on for 4th. Because if the horse would have run 5th, I think the stewards would have had to disqualify the winner for costing that horse 4th. |