Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

View Poll Results: Which tax approach would be the most "fair"?
The current income tax system - many rates, higher rates for more affluent people. 5 23.81%
One income tax rate - (i.e. make twice as much, pay twice as much) 8 38.10%
Per capita tax - everyone pays same tax regardless of income level 0 0%
European style VAT tax assessed at each stage of product development, assembly, and sale. 0 0%
National sales tax, assessed at last sale only - not during assembly or production 4 19.05%
Some other system, either thought of already or yet to be drafted up 4 19.05%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-21-2010, 07:39 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default Fair Taxation

If you were in charge of revenue generation for the government, which tax system would you implement as the most "fair"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:04 AM
timmgirvan's Avatar
timmgirvan timmgirvan is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Powder Springs Ga
Posts: 5,780
Default

Fair tax is the best for my money
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:15 PM
SOREHOOF's Avatar
SOREHOOF SOREHOOF is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Peoples Republic of the United Socialist States of Chinese America
Posts: 1,501
Default

What is considered fair? I'm sure a lot of people think that the more you make the higher your rate should be is fair. It doesn't seem fair to me that almost half of this country pays no income taxes. It doesn't seem fair to me to keep beating up on ciggy smokers. New $1.60 tax per pack in NY.
__________________
"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military."...William S. Burroughs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:32 PM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

My personal opinion is that one rate is the way to go. Why? Because "fair" cannot be defined mathematically. The closest we will ever come to fair is "proportional". And that means one rate. Take the first, I don't know, say, $50,000. Nobody pays taxes on their first $50k. Anything above that is at the same rate, whether you make $55,000 or $550,000. The same fraction of your income goes to the government. That's it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:36 PM
SOREHOOF's Avatar
SOREHOOF SOREHOOF is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Peoples Republic of the United Socialist States of Chinese America
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
My personal opinion is that one rate is the way to go. Why? Because "fair" cannot be defined mathematically. The closest we will ever come to fair is "proportional". And that means one rate. Take the first, I don't know, say, $50,000. Nobody pays taxes on their first $50k. Anything above that is at the same rate, whether you make $55,000 or $550,000. The same fraction of your income goes to the government. That's it.
I'll go along with that.
__________________
"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military."...William S. Burroughs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2010, 06:42 PM
Patrick333 Patrick333 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 1,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
My personal opinion is that one rate is the way to go. Why? Because "fair" cannot be defined mathematically. The closest we will ever come to fair is "proportional". And that means one rate. Take the first, I don't know, say, $50,000. Nobody pays taxes on their first $50k. Anything above that is at the same rate, whether you make $55,000 or $550,000. The same fraction of your income goes to the government. That's it.
As long as Congress doesn't exempt itself from it and the rate is "fair", it sounds good to me.
__________________
The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely the one who dropped it - Lou Holtz
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-22-2010, 10:48 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
My personal opinion is that one rate is the way to go. Why? Because "fair" cannot be defined mathematically. The closest we will ever come to fair is "proportional". And that means one rate. Take the first, I don't know, say, $50,000. Nobody pays taxes on their first $50k. Anything above that is at the same rate, whether you make $55,000 or $550,000. The same fraction of your income goes to the government. That's it.
In principal, it sounds good, but we would self destruct as a country.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-22-2010, 10:59 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

I like the idea of a sales tax on all items bought or sold, non-essential items being taxed more than say food and clothes and toilet paper. No income tax at all.
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2010, 06:24 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob View Post
In principal, it sounds good, but we would self destruct as a country.
If we continue to spend like drunken sailors, yeah, we're cooked, but we could definitely bring in enough revenue with a flat system for reasonable expenditure. We would need to finally rid ourselves of many unending and ineffectual government programs.

We have to also take into account that a simple system with no "bracket creep" would also stimulate the economy too, because everybody from laborers to entrepeneurs would be able to make profits without a "gotcha" of getting slammed in a new bracket.

If individuals or companies know they can make a buck they will not hold back on some of the hiring and expansion that creates new jobs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:44 PM
timmgirvan's Avatar
timmgirvan timmgirvan is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Powder Springs Ga
Posts: 5,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SOREHOOF View Post
What is considered fair? I'm sure a lot of people think that the more you make the higher your rate should be is fair. It doesn't seem fair to me that almost half of this country pays no income taxes. It doesn't seem fair to me to keep beating up on ciggy smokers. New $1.60 tax per pack in NY.
It's called the " Fair Tax"...there are books out there explaining it! Fo reals..
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.