Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:07 AM
Split Rock Split Rock is offline
Tropical Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 263
Default How does racing today compare to the 70s or 80s?

I grew up on racing in the mid 80s and early 90s. I look at the cards today and long for the type of racing I remember when I started.

Is the quality of racing the same today? Better? Worse? Not even really talking about the stakes races but more the other stuff.

Seems like a lot more layoff, droppers win today then they did years ago. I dunno...maybe its just me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:15 AM
Port Conway Lane Port Conway Lane is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

That's a broad question depending on exactly what you mean.
When you say droppers win more you are referring to trainers. It would be exhaustive to research those stats. I recall there was talk of collusion among the big three trainers in Maryland in the late 70's in which they wouldn't claim each other's horses. I've always understood racing is healthy when there are abundant claims.

Quote:
I look at the cards today and long for the type of racing I remember when I started.
I guess that depends on where you played. Today you can choose any track or competitive races with large fields that you wish. In the mid 80's I would play Maryland on the weekends and Charles Town Friday and Saturday night. I couldn't get enough with only 40 races to choose from in between the work week. I do kind of miss that...It doesn't make sense to me but I feel I was more selective back then.

I'd say the quality of racing is no better or worse. People have a way of remembering the good times and forgetting the bad. When you're in the present, the bad times aren't as easily forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:35 AM
Arletta's Avatar
Arletta Arletta is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Meadow in the Sun
Posts: 9,385
Default

I don't think there is any comparison to racing then and now... Horses ran more often it seemed back then it was't so much about rushing them off to stud like it is now days. The breed was a bit sturdier too.
Now we are lucky to see horses race past their 3 yr old year. It will never be like it was IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2010, 04:23 AM
keithting's Avatar
keithting keithting is offline
Hollywood Park
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 959
Post

It's like comparing Babe Ruth to Mark McGuire. Good Luck !

I love it when I still see a horse get a "blow out" 1-2 days prior to race day. Don't see it often anymore......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2010, 06:43 AM
2Hot4TV's Avatar
2Hot4TV 2Hot4TV is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glendora
Posts: 2,342
Default

Horses worked or raced every 5 to 7 days.

You had tons of claiming races of all different values,

10k, 12.5, 16,20,25,32,40,50,62.5k

It was hard to draw in to a race because they filled

You had trouble getting the stalls you wanted

yes the majority of horses could run faster than a fat man, as I remember.

No way could a bunch of horses named Warren get stalls
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2010, 07:15 AM
herkhorse's Avatar
herkhorse herkhorse is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gonesville
Posts: 11,422
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Hot4TV View Post
Horses worked or raced every 5 to 7 days.

You had tons of claiming races of all different values,

10k, 12.5, 16,20,25,32,40,50,62.5k

It was hard to draw in to a race because they filled

You had trouble getting the stalls you wanted

yes the majority of horses could run faster than a fat man, as I remember.

No way could a bunch of horses named Warren get stalls
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2010, 07:46 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS View Post
Whether intentional or not think you hit on most important part. McGwire- drugs.

Not saying sport was clean back in 70's but not out of control like today. That has large part to do with the differences between now and then.
ridiculous

Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2010, 07:48 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

I think drugs were likely just as bad in the 70's. Sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2010, 12:49 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS View Post
What is ridiculous?

Was drug use more prevalent in 70's? Is that what you are saying in your own unique way?
Far worse yet people were oblivious to the situation.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.