![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard's Kid just won the Pacific Classic.
NT |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() East Coast horses dominate the P.C.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ntamm-
I hear what you are saying about synthetics. People don't like the synthetics because it makes the races unpredictable and it allows an utter mediocrity like Richard's kid into the winner circle in a grade 1 race. But if you say that, doesnt that make Zenyatta's streak that much more impressive? This has nothing to do with any rachel vs zenyatta arguments. My point only is that people knock her winning streak because it was done on the west coast on synthetics but in the next breath decry the surface as unpredictable. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't get it. Well, I understand the argument, but don't think it really says anything. Zenyatta's streak is no more or less impressive because it is on a surface that allows mediocre horses to compete with some who may be better than them on conventional dirt. The surface isn't random in the sense that the best synthetic horse won't win in a fairly run race, it's random in the sense that it's difficult to handicap/predict which bum will like the track. If Zenyatta is better than her competition (on the surface) then it's not like she'll lose one day because of "random" results.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Einstein, who if he is anything is consistent, ran a great race and he certainly is a better racehorse than Richard's kid. And if that is the case... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Note Serious sarcasm here.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|