![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 12+ horses in this race and it's hard to make a case for any of them. None have a mare that has produced a turf winner.
Can you make a case for any of them? I'd serious like to hear your thoughts. I can go only by jockey/trainer angles and take the 11, the firt time starter. Thoughts, Spyder
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() of the horses that have started I like the five Dirty During.
his two year old form was easily better than the current form of the others. certainly the kinda race that a first timer with any kind of ability could take down. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 9,10,11 (all FTS) and the 5 Dirty During
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() McPeek has a firster that is well bred for the turf, using the Tomlinson ratings, and he can get a debut winner over a route of ground.
Small stable of Mario Morales can get a turf winner first crack. Again nice Tomlinson #s on Would and Could so he might wake up & hit the board. 11-3-4 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Interesting that besides one horse that has run, no one can make a case for all the rest. Like I said, I find it interesting there are so many horses that don't make sense in this race. Just find it strange.
I can see the "all" button producing a crazy horse in pick 3's for big money
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The 12 is a touch interesting but the post will hurt
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Every. Single. Time. I believe this summer's strategy will be spend less and lose gracefully rather than being humiliated by that. |