Invasor and Bernardini - Time Comparison

SniperSB23 · #1 10-26-2006, 05:14 PM

I find it interesting that even though Invasor and Bernardini haven't faced each other, all three of Invasor's American races this year were run at the same track and distance as a race Bernardini ran in. Here are the time comparisons:

Dist Track Invasor Bernardini
9f Saratoga 1:49.0 1:50.2
9.5f Pimlico 1:54.2 1:54.3
10f Belmont 2:01.1 2:01.0

Obviously the track at Saratoga was sloppy (although sealed) for the Jim Dandy so that probably accounts for the difference at 9 furlongs but otherwise they are dead even on raw time. The Beyer's all favored Bernardini but many of these races were single race variants so aren't very significant. I don't think there will be too much seperating Invasor and Bernardini other than their odds on BC Day. I'll be cashing my tickets on the Invincible Invasor.

TheSpyder · #2 10-26-2006, 05:19 PM

Good work Sniperman and very interesting, although Big B is always throttling down and we may see if he's got that competitive gear. If so, B's gonna kick off and say bye bye.

Spyderman

Scav · #3 10-26-2006, 06:14 PM

Snip...Time only matters in jail...

TitanSooner · #4 10-26-2006, 06:26 PM

and quarter horses

SniperSB23 · #5 10-26-2006, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

Snip...Time only matters in jail...

Go ahead and throw more money at the paper superstar that will be vastly overbet on November 4th. There is exactly one horse he beat that is even pre-entered in the BC Classic. Do the times not matter because he could have gone faster? That is as illusory as the idea of Bernardini being a superhorse. He ran his last two furlongs in the Traver's in 24.77 and his last two furlongs in the JCGC in 25.16. Do people really think he can go that much faster after running 8 furlongs?

hoovesupsideyourhead · #6 10-26-2006, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Go ahead and throw more money at the paper superstar that will be vastly overbet on November 4th. There is exactly one horse he beat that is even pre-entered in the BC Classic. Do the times not matter because he could have gone faster? That is as illusory as the idea of Bernardini being a superhorse. He ran his last two furlongs in the Traver's in 24.77 and his last two furlongs in the JCGC in 25.16. Do people really think he can go that much faster after running 8 furlongs?

ill only say..he went like that because he didnt have to go any faster...you will see him run on bc day...

Scav · #7 10-26-2006, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Go ahead and throw more money at the paper superstar that will be vastly overbet on November 4th. There is exactly one horse he beat that is even pre-entered in the BC Classic. Do the times not matter because he could have gone faster? That is as illusory as the idea of Bernardini being a superhorse. He ran his last two furlongs in the Traver's in 24.77 and his last two furlongs in the JCGC in 25.16. Do people really think he can go that much faster after running 8 furlongs?

Bern and Invasor have fairly equal tops, fig wise. That being said, Bern looks like he is going to run another top in this race, pattern wise, his progression is unbelievable fig wise....mini-layoff,top,top, mini-layoff, top, top, mini-layoff,miniscal move backward, essentially a pair, he is going to explode next Saturday

Revolution · #8 10-26-2006, 08:29 PM

Bernardini has 4 of the fastest 5 beyers run in a route this year and he wasn't asked for run in almost any race.

The only horses that can beat him are George Washington and David Junior, and that is only if they turn out to be dirt lovers. George Washington clearly has as much talent as Bernardini, but that doesn't mean it will transfer over to dirt.

Scav · #9 10-26-2006, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolution

Bernardini has 4 of the fastest 5 beyers run in a route this year and he wasn't asked for run in almost any race.

The only horses that can beat him are George Washington and David Junior, and that is only if they turn out to be dirt lovers. George Washington clearly has as much talent as Bernardini, but that doesn't mean it will transfer over to dirt.

Keep on quotes Beyers and see where that will get you.

Invasor is about a length slower then Bern if they run their tops. While they are both lightly races, Invasor has gotten more time off in between his starts and has room to improve....

brianwspencer · #10 10-26-2006, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

Keep on quotes Beyers and see where that will get you.

Invasor is about a length slower then Bern if they run their tops. While they are both lightly races, Invasor has gotten more time off in between his starts and has room to improve....

i agree with the assessment of the length difference -- but i also know that the only time that bernardini has been looked in the eye was the only race he ever lost. invasor has shown that he's tough and hangs in there.

what's bernardini going to do when he hooks lava man at the 3/8 pole?

that's not the kind of question i'm willing to take even money to find the answer to.

Scav · #11 10-26-2006, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

i agree with the assessment of the length difference -- but i also know that the only time that bernardini has been looked in the eye was the only race he ever lost. invasor has shown that he's tough and hangs in there.

what's bernardini going to do when he hooks lava man at the 3/8 pole?

that's not the kind of question i'm willing to take even money to find the answer to.

whoa.....That was his MSW, all horses have excuses 1st out....can't hold that against him at all...he has hooked horses before, he hooked SNS in the Preakness, matter of fact just blew by him.

brianwspencer · #12 10-26-2006, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

whoa.....That was his MSW, all horses have excuses 1st out....can't hold that against him at all...he has hooked horses before, he hooked SNS in the Preakness, matter of fact just blew by him.

"hooking" Sweetnorthernsaint in the preakness does not count one bit. watch the replay and watch SNS weaving around exhausted from the campaign like a drunken sorority girl in a borrowed ferrari.

he hasn't had to deal with a horse who doesn't just fold and give up when they come on even terms. and we're kidding ourselves if we think that everyone in the classic is just going to defer to him like all the other fields have when he approaches.

i'm just having a hard time believing that even money is the kind of payoff you want for taking that risk against some of the best horses in the world.

don't get me wrong -- i completely believe that there is a great chance that he wins, or even wins for fun here like ghostzapper, but it's a risky proposition from this side.

Scav · #13 10-26-2006, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

"hooking" Sweetnorthernsaint in the preakness does not count one bit. watch the replay and watch SNS weaving around exhausted from the campaign like a drunken sorority girl in a borrowed ferrari.

he hasn't had to deal with a horse who doesn't just fold and give up when they come on even terms. and we're kidding ourselves if we think that everyone in the classic is just going to defer to him like all the other fields have when he approaches.

i'm just having a hard time believing that even money is the kind of payoff you want for taking that risk against some of the best horses in the world.

don't get me wrong -- i completely believe that there is a great chance that he wins, or even wins for fun here like ghostzapper, but it's a risky proposition from this side.

As far as a win wager, I couldn't agree more, but as the anchor on a pick three/four/six, he is as solid of an anchor as they come

brianwspencer · #14 10-26-2006, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

As far as a win wager, I couldn't agree more, but as the anchor on a pick three/four/six, he is as solid of an anchor as they come

he'll be on my ticket, but he won't be anchoring anything -- i'll be going about 4-6 deep in the classic, i'm going to have a hard time ruling horses out with invasor, lava man, david junior, and flower alley in it.

the way i'm looking at it is that if he wins, he wins for fun and he's as good as he's looked beating up on nobody all summer.

but if he doesn't win -- this race becomes as crapshoot. you're left with about 7-9 other horses for whom you could make a case for winning if he doesn't.

THAT is scary.

Merlinsky · #15 10-26-2006, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

whoa.....That was his MSW, all horses have excuses 1st out....can't hold that against him at all...he has hooked horses before, he hooked SNS in the Preakness, matter of fact just blew by him.

SNS only just recently came back. He wasn't himself for the Preakness and got flattened the rest of the way in that race. 5 months later he comes back for the win but wow that took forever to recover. I'm sure they were optimistic because they said they were considering him for various races along the way but he was still worn out for awhile and I don't think Bernardini can take all the credit.

Hopefully somebody will be better able to hook him in the BCC because most of them aren't rubber legged from the TC trail and prep races. It's more entertaining if he has to work for it...he's done so much coasting already. I want a good race and some fantastic horses battling---am I greedy if I want several good horses in the same stretch drive? Happily so I guess.

Scav · #16 10-26-2006, 10:47 PM

I was telling someone today that this has a Ghostzapper feeling to it. that field had a 'strong' look to it and he just dusted them....

brianwspencer · #17 10-26-2006, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

I was telling someone today that this has a Ghostzapper feeling to it. that field had a 'strong' look to it and he just dusted them....

and i very well understand that he might be just that good.

but when my money is on the line, i'm sure as hell going to cover myself in case he isn't.

i sort of want him to be that good, because it'd be a great story -- but it just seems that he's had it too easy this summer.

Scav · #18 10-26-2006, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

and i very well understand that he might be just that good.

but when my money is on the line, i'm sure as hell going to cover myself in case he isn't.

i sort of want him to be that good, because it'd be a great story -- but it just seems that he's had it too easy this summer.

Agree...for me though, he is a singleton, maybe a saver with Invasor but Bern is getting singled in the pick six if I get a ticket into the $180 range and auto single in the pick four....OB/ALL/ALL/Bern is what I am considering

brianwspencer · #19 10-26-2006, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav

Agree...for me though, he is a singleton, maybe a saver with Invasor but Bern is getting singled in the pick six if I get a ticket into the $180 range and auto single in the pick four....OB/ALL/ALL/Bern is what I am considering

i always find that so interesting every year seeing how people approach the same bets

== but isn't OB racing at the start of the pick 6 and not the start of the pick 4? the mile should start the p4, so i'm planning on going short in the distaff and the turf, with 3-4 runners in each, and going deep in the classic and mile.

Scav · #20 10-26-2006, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

i always find that so interesting every year seeing how people approach the same bets

== but isn't OB racing at the start of the pick 6 and not the start of the pick 4? the mile should start the p4, so i'm planning on going short in the distaff and the turf, with 3-4 runners in each, and going deep in the classic and mile.

your right, I confused the Distaff with the F/M and came up with OB in the 1st leg...no idea how that happened....so now I can play OB/ALL/ALL/ALL/ALL/Bern LOL