$96 play took down $970k Belmont Day P6

[Kasept]

ELMONT, N.Y. – There was only one person who correctly selected the winners of all six graded stakes races for the Pick 6 on Belmont Stakes Day, Saturday, June 6, resulting in a payout of $969,345.

The lone winning ticket was put together by a Youbet.com, Inc. (Youbet) customer who spent $96 to construct the Pick 6 wager. The winning ticket:

• one horse in the first leg (Fabulous Strike)
  
• two horses in the second leg (Diamondrella, Raw Silk)
  
• two horses in the third leg (Munnings, Hull)
  
• two horses in the fourth leg (Gabby’s Golden Gal, Livin Lovin)
  
• three horses in the fifth leg (Gio Ponti, Cosmonaut, Wesley)
  
• two horses in the sixth leg (Summer Bird, Charitable Man)

The New York Racing Association, Inc.’s (NYRA) mutuel department utilizes progressive scan technology, which generates a report after each leg of any multi-race wager so that all dollars can be tracked throughout the wager, ensuring no one has tampered with any ticket after the first leg of the wager. In addition, NYRA verified with Youbet the structure and cost of this wager, and the time that it was made, before authorizing its payment. The winning Pick 6 wager was placed via Youbet at 1:56 p.m. on Saturday, and the pool closed at 2:34 p.m.

The individual winners of the six races that made up the Pick 6, along with their win payouts, are listed below:

• True North Handicap (G2) – Fabulous Strike ($3.80)
• Just A Game (G1) – Diamondrella ($21.20)
• Woody Stephens (G2) – Munnings ($9.00)
• Acorn (G1) – Gabby’s Golden Gal ($28.40)
• Manhattan Handicap (G1) – Gio Ponti ($9.20)
• Belmont Stakes (G1) – Summer Bird ($25.80)

[South Beach Luv]

Props to them for leaving Justwhistledixie off

[GPK]

Originally Posted by South Beach Luv

Props to them for leaving Justwhistledixie off

and Forever Together.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by GPK

and Forever Together.

and MTB

[SniperSB23]

Is there anyway to know if that was the only ticket they played? That would seem a reasonable ticket if it was their AAACAA ticket.

[smuthg]

Originally Posted by gales0678

and MTB

and This Ones for Phil...

[-BT-]

throws out the chalks in 5 of 6 legs...............and this is why i am where i am, and they're 970K to the good. I wouldn't have given you a nickel for that ticket before the first leg, go figure

-bt-

[golfer]

That is an absolutely BIZARRE ticket.

[Riot]

Hey - those of use who think that is bizarre, are not winning

Maybe we are the ones that should re-examine our idea of what isn't bizarre when it comes to Pick 6 ticket construction!

[golfer]

I realize that this ticket took the money, and I only write this as someone who handicapped the card. It's just my opinion, but the bizarre thing about the play was the non-winning horses that were used, and those that were left off. I wonder if this was the only ticket the winner played.

[Riot]

Hey - Steve is talking about this ticket on ATR right now, but why is he assuming a man constructed this ticket?

Steve is saying, "he used" - not "she used" Just sayin' ....

[hockey2315]

I actually don't find the structure that bizarre if the person was structuring his/her ticket around prices in the second and fourth legs.

[Kasept]

Originally Posted by Riot

Hey - Steve is talking about this ticket on ATR right now, but why is he assuming a man constructed this ticket?

Steve is saying, "he used" - not "she used" Just sayin' ....

I said 'he'... and added 'or she'.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Kasept

I said 'he'... and added 'or she'.

[golfer]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

I actually don't find the structure that bizarre if the person was structuring his/her ticket around prices in the second and fourth legs.

It wasn't the structure, just the horses used/not used. Raw Silk the 2nd most likely winner behind Diamondrella? Livin Lovin the next best after Gabby? Cosmonaut and Wesly just in case Gio Ponti didn't win? Once again, it's just my opinion after handicapping the races, but it seems bizarre to me.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by golfer

It wasn't the structure, just the horses used/not used. Raw Silk the 2nd most likely winner behind Diamondrella? Livin Lovin the next best after Gabby? Cosmonaut and Wesly just in case Gio Ponti didn't win? Once again, it's just my opinion after handicapping the races, but it seems bizarre to me.

it really seems like he/she used multiple tickets.. but I guess you never know!

[docicu3]

Some of this is big score mentality. Throw out chalk to make payout a worthwhile endeavor. If he loses on a chalky payout (s)he doesn't mind as much by playing second and third choices in most races things are very different as this ticket was alone in it's enormous reward. Very interesting idea. This was no birthday number player.

[hockey2315]

Originally Posted by golfer

It wasn't the structure, just the horses used/not used. Raw Silk the 2nd most likely winner behind Diamondrella? Livin Lovin the next best after Gabby? Cosmonaut and Wesly just in case Gio Ponti didn't win? Once again, it's just my opinion after handicapping the races, but it seems bizarre to me.

It seems to me like if this was the only ticket that he/she played, s/he was going for a big pay-off or prices in a few legs rather than merely using the most likely winners in each race.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

it really seems like he/she used multiple tickets.. but I guess you never know!

Consider they may have constructed multiple tickets, but only played one, going for the big payoff, and bowing out of any chance at less. After watching how the early races were unfolding.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Gabby's Golden Gal and Dimanondrella were impossible uses for me. I singled both JWD and FT in those two races.

And I didn't include Gio Ponti because of distance, wet turf, and layoff even though I believed he might have been the best horse going in.