Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2011, 11:23 AM
alphanumeric1's Avatar
alphanumeric1 alphanumeric1 is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 105
Default NYS can't keep their hands out of Racing's till

Gov Cuomo Executive Budget Proposal:
Racing Purse Surcharge. Currently, the Racing and Wagering Board’s Regulation of Racing Account operates at a deficit, necessitating loans from the State’s taxpayer-financed General Fund in order to maintain the Board’s regulatory activities that are directly related to the conduct of horse racing. The Executive Budget includes legislation to establish a two and three quarters percent surcharge on purses for all horse races conducted within the State. Moneys from this surcharge will be directly deposited in the Regulation of Racing account, which, when combined with cost containment actions undertaken by the Racing Board, will eliminate the account’s deficit and will ensure that the cost for the Board’s regulatory activities are fully borne by the Racing Industry rather than by taxpayers.
__________________
___________________
Woulda Coulda Shoulda
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:10 PM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

So what else is new? Blue state money grabbing -- same ole, same ole...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2011, 05:18 PM
richard's Avatar
richard richard is offline
Hollywood Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: cheap seats
Posts: 951
Default

There should be cuts not tax increases to fund excessive salaries and benefits .
__________________
Tom Cooley photo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2011, 07:26 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard View Post
There should be cuts not tax increases to fund excessive salaries and benefits .
Wait till you see the raping of the slot chop. If you think the state isn't going to take more then they are currently agreeing too, I got a sweet bridge for you
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2011, 07:30 PM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
Wait till you see the raping of the slot chop. If you think the state isn't going to take more then they are currently agreeing too, I got a sweet bridge for you
Is that bridge also in New York?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2011, 11:56 PM
banter's Avatar
banter banter is offline
Sunshine Park
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 95
Default

Certainly the budget proposal's language is vague. A surcharge to fund "the Board's regulatory activities"... Are those activities spelled out anywhere? And if so, who is paid "X" to work "Y" hours to carry out the tasks? If those questions have not been clearly answered, then the surcharge fails to meet accountability standards and should be disputed as a canard.
__________________
Favorite Trick--2yo HOY 1997
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.