Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Really? The official transcript of the race is a ridiculous reference point?
So an impartial view of the race by a professional with years of experience, a good vantage point, and access to various camera angles of the race isn't a valid source in your eyes?
Please explain how the chart callers interpretation has no validity since it is his job to describe the race for the official record?
If there is a hearing about this incident it is a sure bet that the chart will be referred to as "evidence".
|
That would all be well and good if it were realistic, but I've seen too many situations where the chart caller goes out of the way to agree with the stewards no matter how questionable (or even bad) the call.
Are you really going to pretend all chart callers do a good job? Do they really use all the camera angles available and still get the chart out in 15 minutes?