Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
You are being ridiculous. Which races allow the humans to take Lasix?
|
I'm saying that Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hemorrhage is not a problem only of horses.
Quote:
|
Maybe 93% show "some" bleeding, but of that percentage, how many can race without side effects and really need it to be successful? I'm guessing it is a MUCH smaller number.
|
How do you define "successful"? Earning money?
Because I'm sure the horse would much prefer to have air in his alveolar sacs during running, instead of blood and hemosiderophages. It makes oxygenation easier.
Quote:
|
After all, we had racing for a century before it was deemed necessary for so many horses.
|
A century ago, we didn't have the modern medical capability we have now. Medical advancement in health care of the horse is a good thing. We didn't have penicillin during World War one. Does that mean we shouldn't have used it in Viet Nam?
And we've raced horses for much longer than a century.
Quote:
|
Plain and simple, it was abused because many felt it was a performance enhancer and that those that actually did need it were getting an advantage. So, they started searching for easier and easier ways to get Lasix for the horse. That is what got us where we are today.
|
But today we have modern medicine, and research, and we are far more educated on the extent and complications of EIPH in race horses. We are completely familiar with the pharmacology of lasix. We haven't had a problem with lasix diluting drug samples for over 20 years.
So now, with our increased education and knowledge, the veterinary world is advising the horse racing world to allow one drug - lasix - to continue to be used as a
therapeutic medication on race day, for the health and welfare of the horse.
But those that control racing are making a stupid, ignorant choice to do the opposite, based upon outdated and no longer valid "reasons and knowledge" from literally decades ago.