any time you win 25 games in a regular season you had a very good regular season.
and the pac 10 didnt suck as much as the east coast bias made it out to be.
Washington was a tough team with some real good players. UCLA could play and had some NBA talent. USC was decent. Washington State, as Chuck pointed out,was a good team.
the Pac 10 proved its worthy by showing up to play ball in the tourney.
Arizona's run was no fluke. They were one of the country's top teams and they only got better as the year went on (except for two losses late in the season). They were an entirely different team at the end of the season then when they played Kansas in the beginning of the season. They only had one senior on the whole team.
Its okay if you didnt watch them or follow them all season, but they certainly did not suck at any point.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?  |
|