Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
And what about John Henry? Even though he ran more often on the grass, he was just as good on the dirt as the grass. He was a much better horse than Ferdinand.
|
I don't agree at all that John Henry was just as good on dirt as he was on grass.
Here's John Henry's career on dirt in stakes races - races from most recent on:
Hollywood Gold Cup: 2nd by 2
Santa Anita Handicap: 5th by 8
Jockey Club Gold Cup: 5th by 7
Meadowlands Cup: 3rd by 6
Santa Anita Handicap: 2nd by a nose - placed 1st through DQ
Jockey Club Gold Cup: 1st by a head over Peat Moss
Hollywood Gold Cup: 4th by 3
Santa Anita Handicap: 1st by 1 over King Go Go
Jockey Club Gold Cup: 2nd by 5.5
San Marcos Stakes: 1st by 2.5 over El Fantastico
Capital City Handicap: 4th by 2 (33K stake at Penn National)
Mass Cap: 10th by 8.5
I think John Henry was clearly a better turf horse. At age 9, he won the final six turf races of his career - all major turf races.