Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
hey it didnt bother me. The internet is the internet, I take it for what it is and thank DT for making my work hours go by faster.
I just know that those two phrases were the farthest from my mind when I used the term "ripped off".
Do you believe tracks get fairly compensated for their signal?
|
I never even imagined you were trying to say something either unfair or incorrect ( just as, even though he felt a need to make it up, I never called Phil anything close to a " liar " ). I was actually responding more to Phil's response to me ( he likes to take the opposing side to my posts....it's an endearing quality of his
).
The signal fee discussion is a very long, interesting, and complicated one...that frankly I don't have nearly the time for ( at least right now ). Perhaps we can have it over a drink or ten some time this summer. Obviously racetracks started off selling their signals at seemingly very low rates. However, there are a lot of factors to take into consideration in the discussions. Track to track rates face different variables than Track to ADW relationships.
I just hate simple terms like " ripped off " for these very complex discussions. It's probably just another of my annoying qualities.