Quote:
Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane
It seems so easy to handpick horses that have finished behind ANY great horse and then point out how the handpicked horse would be the "worst" winner of that given race.
Not to mention that "worst" is a matter of conjecture.
|
Ah no - the last five females to run 2nd to her are disgraceful slugs.
Name me one Apple Blossom winner in the last 20 years who's no better than Taptam. You can't.
Name me one Santa Margarita winner in the last 20 years who's no better than Dance to my Tune. You can't.
Name me one Lady's Secret winner you've seen who's no better than Lethal Heat. You can't.
Name me one Clement Hirsch winner you've seen who's no better than Anabaa's Creation. You can't.
Name me one Vanity Handicap winner you've see who's no better than Briecat. You can't.
Even if you ignore all the elements of competent handicapping you still can't rationally argue that even the winners of the worst editions of those races aren't better.