Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
You arent really aware of the meaning of intellectually honest or dishonest are you? In order to be intellectually dishonest I would have to knowingly advance an argument that I knew was based on untrue information. Or I would have to knowingly withhold information that was relevant to my argument.
When exactly have I done this?
Just one example. And me saying that Democrats still "blame bush" is simply an opinion based on valid information. No honesty involved.
Keep up the the fight. Your party will need you the next few elections.
|
Is claiming that this is the complete definition of an intellectually dishonesst argument enough evidence of being intellectually dishonest? It is by your standard of such an argument....even though that's hardly a well-rounded, complete definition of an intellectually dishonest argument. Misrepresenting my position repeatedly is an example of being intellectually dishonest...which you have done ad nauseum in claiming I was blaming Bush when I was asking where you sudden concern for financial discussion came from.
Then again, in now a dozen tries, you've still yet to realize that I wasn't blaming Bush for anything when you tried to call me on it, so again, my participation is futile.
Of course, I'll still be more than happy to buy you a beer at Arlington again next year after all this, just like we always do.