Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
he was better than Hill with Arizona. I dont know, I'm just not sold on Hill. Sometimes he looks real good, sometimes he looks below average. He looked horrible against lousiville in the tourney. I always thought he should have been grabbing more rebounds at Arizona.. it always disappoints me when men his size dont grab tons and tons of boards. Basically everyone in the NBA disappoints me when it comes to this besides Howard right now. Shaq will never be an all time great center in my eyes because of this -(the man should have averaged 20 boards per night)
Chase was the best player @ Arizona and I expect him to be the best out of the two in the NBA, though Hill has an incredible size advantage to that.
Chase is a good NBA quality shooter (IMO.. disagree's with dala but thats nothing new) and great athlete... smart too. I think he will do well.
|
Hill can develop into a really good player, Budinger cant. While Hill is hardly there yet, he is very athletic for his size, has a lot of length and a good low post offensive game. He hasnt been playing basketball that long either. Physically he will do fine matching up. Budinger simply doesnt have the quickness to either create his own shot or defend his position in the NBA. He is a pretty good shooter, he will be a limited NBA player. Guys can get stronger, improve their shooting, work at their games, etc. but really cant get quicker.