View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-03-2008, 09:30 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb
Are you referring to the wiretaps that should have been performed on or before 9/10/2001?

Which of the following is preferable:

Option A - Feds listen to conversations when automated machinery picks up words and phrases like "Bomb" and "Death to USA", an analyst hangs up when you start reading your grocery list, but occasionally we find and interdict terrorist attacks BEFORE they occur.

or

Option B - Feds listen to nothing, even the overt planning of the next 9/11-like attack, and we lose tens or hundreds of thousands of Americans. And, last time I checked, getting killed by an enemy of the country classifies as a violation of the victim's rights.
Where in the world do you come up with this garbage?

You understand that criminals are alot smarter then to be talking on the phone about blowing up a building or taking someone out. Haven't you seen the movie Casino where they are using code words on the phone or they are having their wives talk for 30 seconds and THEN they are having a conversation?

I am guessing you live in Nebraska and you just built a hurricane bunker there.
Reply With Quote