Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Yeah, I can't believe this nonsense. "That's too low for the Met".. "Raise it".. "Wait, that's too high for Manteca".. "Uh, lower it"..
So the track started out slow, somehow got faster in between the second and third races, then got slow again?
|
Agreed... if the number sucked, the number sucked. It's certainly reasonable to be bad, as nobody did any running late, obviously. Why sugarcoat it?