Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Now, did you repeat " dirt " twice to try and convince us or yourself?
This was not a dirt race, nor should it be confused as one, and like every prep run on synthetic surface, it has little to no bearing on any races the participants run on actual dirt.
Call it a handicapping challenge, but this year's KY Derby will be filled with the new challenge of figuring out how some horses will do in their actual first start on dirt. The unfortunate thing is to think of the excluded horses that may well have impacted the Derbies of the future had they had the proper surface to run on earlier in their careers. But, the good news is that many of the non-dirt horses that are confused as actual dirt horses will be thoroughly exposed in Louisville on an annual basis.
Anybody that disagrees with this should look at the winner of this year's Sunshine Millions Classic. It aint dirt.
|
Oh yeah. I actually forgot that GG was synthetic because I hardly ever watch (or follow) races there.
Obviously these surfaces are very diffrerent from dirt, but the real confusing part for me is that they are so different from each other too. For awhile I just considered synthetic surfaces as a "third surface"....but even that isn't accurate, because...well just look at the three SoCal tracks with synthetic surfaces.