Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SentToStud
I would not consider comments made by a friend about a former employer as objective.
Nor would my friends consider the same comments from me as objective.
The rest? Opinion. Good? Bad? I don't know.  |
That is the problem, one of my friend's is a former employer, but the other two are current employees, and if anything, it is the former employee who is being the
nicer in his words.
He did agree with the article having worked at the same level as Crisford etc. Their staff turnover is very high, something which i didn't realise.
I know their is a lot of unrest in the camp at the moment, and much of it is to do with the training techniques and who should be training the horses. There are certain people that have got in "far too deep", if they took more of a back seat role and got on with the jobs they are employed to do, i think the operation will start to role again. But why they think that they can buy the competition for success they will continue to fail.
As i have said, maybe now they have a few (what look to be) outstanding stallion prospects they will discontinue to 'scatter' buy at any cost, and start to put faith into their breeding operation. I hope that is the case, because they are killing racing over here by doing that, racing fans don't like it and they are getting frustrated (like me)