![]() |
The First Amendment
seems to be more in effect for some than others. less than 5 years ago and 5 miles away the skinheads were allowed to march and actually protected while heiling hitler and generally acting like a bunch of clowns .
What makes this clown any different than them? Especially since he's 64 and has the name Arjunsinh Sindha. The question may have been serious? http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/2...bway08.article |
i don't think this is an outrage dell. the guy had no business going up to someone and asking such a thing.
|
Quote:
|
so...people should be able to come up to you and freely insult you and you should have no recourse? i disagree. and because they have a 'tradition' of not liking each other, there should be nothing done? i think the restaurant worker was out of line, and he should be fired as well.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Insults in a private conversation should now be legally actionable? If being moronic and insulting is a crime now, we're in big trouble. Especially CSC. |
i know brian, i just think there's a fine line....hard to say really if it should be allowed or not. i just don't know that people should freely be able to come up and say things like that. put yourself in the customers shoes, should someone be able to say something like that to you with no worry at all? hey, it's free speech, but as holmes said, that doesn't allow shouting fire in a crowded theatre. i wonder what he'd say about this. is it free speech, or something more akin to verbal assault? is there such a thing? if there is, is this it? if a guy walked up to a lady and said i hear there's whores here, are you one, would that be harassment? if so, why wasn't this harassment? imo, this isn't similar to a protest, which isn't on a personal level. this was very much personal.
|
Quote:
I've had worse things said to my face on dozens of occasions in my life and never once thought about calling the cops, nor do I think it's reasonable that I should be able to. I think this story is positively ridiculous, and the idea that being mean to someone once with no recurring harassment issues is grounds for legal action of any kind is absurd. If this is the case, the City of Chicago could pay all of their bills every year just by sending cops in on "mean patrol" into bars by Wrigley Field all season long. At $75 a pop, they'd be rich, if being mean is now against the law. Unbelievable. |
So all those years ago when I was still riding races and I came back from a bone-head ride and the trainer called me the dumbest biotch to ever sit a saddle, I should have called the cops on him ? LOL Yeah right. Or how about the fans that call you names and cuss you out on the way back to the jocks room?
People shouldnt be so thin skinned, had the man said Id like to shoot you because you are a scum bag then yeah by all means call the cops on him. |
Quote:
And as for being thin-skinned, I'm notoriously thin-skinned. But there's a huge difference between getting upset when people are mean, or crude, or tasteless or offensive, and freaking calling the cops on them for doing that. I don't think it's out of line to expect that people will flash an ounce of class and not do things like that, but that's an entirely different conversation from getting them arrested for hurting your feelings. Christ. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think back home his inlaws would chop his head off or at least geld the worthless infidel. Calling the police is funny. Hopefully he has no children! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.