![]() |
Agreed Laharge but once a horse is clearly not going to contend with the top two there is no reason to ride him hard to be closer to them. He had 3rd locked up so there was no reason for him to be ridden hard late, though if he had, he might have been closer.
Two weeks rest, plus two long flights could have caused a regression. I think CC might be better than what he showed on Sat. relative to the top pair. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I never got the fascination with Ice Box either.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is a message board. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I met you on the old DRF message board....so maybe you're right. By the way, I had a nice chat with your idol Saturday night. You never came up. |
Quote:
You can still get to the old drf message board, can't post but last I checked you could read the hilarity. |
Quote:
|
While watching WTDW's action down the backside, it was clear he wasn't handling the surface. I expect him to bounce back and contend later in the summer in the big races.
On the flip side, Creative Cause moved great over the surface. I think the two flights took the starch out of his finish. I was worried about that, but still included him, which now seems wasteful. Had he stayed at Churchill or moved to Pimlico early, he probably would have been a more respectable four or five lengths back at the end. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.