Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
To the contrary. If (taxpayers the ones who will support the baby) get a say, abortion is the only way to go. For the sake of the mother, baby and society.
A great litmus test would be if you're too young or poor to own, maintain and insure a vehicle (whether you own one or not)you're not even close to being able to feed, house and insure a baby.
|
Then why is the GOP working so hard to simultaneously make abortion harder to obtain and cutting food and support to little kids? It figures a short life of starvation is preferable to abortion before being able to feel pain? Why is it fighting so hard against poor women having access to birth control?
Hell, it's even working to gestate nonviable fetuses in brain-dead women:
http://jezebel.com/texas-woman-force...s-n-1508045921
How about for people who suffer a serious illness or accident after having their kids that ends their ability to support their families (which they could previously do)? Do you support starvation of those children because their parent or parents took a bad step on the ice? What's your position, Del? That's what happened to the couple in Kansas (the one in which the sperm donor is now obligated to pay child support because he and the women involved didn't follow state law when they did the artificial insemination).