Quote:
Originally Posted by brianwspencer
She definitely understands it.
You don't have to worry yourself even a second more about THAT problem with your "argument."
|
You obviously didn't understand what I was saying either. If you understood it, then tell me what I was saying. What was my point? I will explain it:
My question had to do with the Constitutionality argument. My question was whether the alleged discrimination of not allowing same sex marriage derives simply from the fact that a man can't marry a man, or does it derive because gay people are a group per se, and by not allowing same-sex marriage, you are discriminating against a group. That was what I was trying to ask Danzig.