Quote:
Originally Posted by RolloTomasi
Why don't you simply clarify what you mean instead of the jackass macho head games? A couple of the CA Derby preps were apparently Sh!t because they had small fields. I guess this means they were unbettable (never mind that Out Of Bounds paid out at 10-1 and Drill nearly 4-1).
However, they certainly were relevant and will continue to be so, because they will invariably feature top class prospects.
Giacomo was what, 6 years ago? Talk about a fair weather fan. And, once again, I was not "defending the product". I was simply pointing out all the CA-based horses in the last decade (I know, I know, that's ancient history) that were, in fact, "relevant" on the Derby trail.
I produced the list quickly because I follow horse racing. Do you?
|
Sorry.. Unbettable Sh*t. Is that clear enough. For the last 7 years my most profitable segment is Derby Prep Super plays and if I can't get 8 horses in the gate the race is unplayable so that is my baseline.
As far as being a fan, I am a consumer of the markets put forward by tracks and what I've been getting from Santa Anita is not playable. And by the
way I post my plays on the selection thread for all to see.. I don't stay in the safety of the Paddock pontificating. And as of right now I fuking LOVE Baffert.